Six Accusations from an Ethereum Developer: ETH Lost Not to Rivals but to Itself

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilaturaGemini 翻譯2626 words

An Ethereum developer published a long-form article elaborating on what they believe Ethereum has done wrong in recent years, bluntly pointing out: Ethereum did not lose to its competitors, it lost to itself. (Context: Ethereum fell below $2,000 for the first time this year! Yet futures OI shows shorts are increasing.) (Background: Analysts warn: Ethereum target price is only $1,800, hitting a 13-month low.) What Ethereum missed was not the market, but itself. When you don't want to blame the people who made Ethereum what it is today, you say "ETH got the market cap it deserved." But the reason this cap is what it is today lies behind specific people and specific dates, not some vague coordination theory. A disclaimer before the accusations. As an early funding participant, I am still developing on Ethereum. I respect its vision and liquidity. At the same time, I am also a disgruntled, underwater holder, and that is the point: this is an insider speaking the truth, not a Solana shiller throwing stones from the sidelines. Sometime between 2021 and 2023, the discourse of the Ethereum Foundation shifted. "We are building" became "We are infrastructure." Vitalik's focus shifted from Casper specifications to articles about pluralism, soulbound tokens, and network states. The "credible neutrality and generous benefactor" image in David Hoffman's writing is exactly the rhetoric mature institutions use to defend their ceded territory. This is acting like an incumbent before even securing the seat. In the market, your posture leads to results. Acting like a winner before you've won is exactly why challengers are taking your lunch. Ethereum acted like a retired chairman before it even won the seat, and the price chart reflects this accurately: since The Merge, the price of ETH against BTC has fallen by about 65%. The marketing core of The Merge was a 99.95% reduction in energy consumption. Go look at the Ethereum official website. This choice exposed the Ethereum Foundation's target audience: they were appealing to their own conscience, not the market. Institutions want yield. Developers want certainty. Users want cheaper transactions. Not marketing user experience but marketing ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) shows that Ethereum is answering questions that capital providers never asked. For years, ESG critics and climate activists have used carbon emissions to attack PoW. This attack did nothing to Bitcoin because it didn't hold water, and more importantly, those allocating capital simply didn't care. Ethereum spent its most significant narrative timing defending against a harmless attack instead of marketing speed and yield. Meanwhile, Solana was marketing speed. Proof of Stake (PoS) had been on the roadmap since Ethereum launched in 2015. Vitalik was discussing slasher algorithms as early as early 2014. The Merge didn't land until September 15, 2022. Seven years from the announcement, spanning two full crypto cycles. Solana launched its mainnet beta in March 2020. While Ethereum spent its biggest narrative window delivering PoS, Solana delivered wallets, multiple decentralized exchanges, aggregators, money markets, and the foundation for an alternative DeFi stack. The cost was not just the passage of time on the calendar, but the dominance window ETH needed to enter the 2021 bull market. By the time PoS landed, the modular vs. monolithic debate had become a hot topic, and Ethereum was no longer in a dominant position. PoS is central to the "ETH as money" thesis. Issuance discipline. Native yield. Sound money. Three years after The Merge, the Ethereum Foundation still hasn't launched a first-party staking app suitable for average users. The official path is: operate via command-line tools on a completely air-gapped computer, stake at least 32 ETH, and run and maintain a validator node yourself. Users can only take a detour through Lido, and Lido's share remains around 25%. Vitalik himself has pointed out this centralization risk. Every asset that wants to be money has a default custody and yield path. Bitcoin has Bitcoin Core. The USD has banks. Yet ETH's most important monetary feature has no canonical interface. When an organization doesn't want to compete, it says "we don't pick winners." This is a constructive failure hidden beneath all other failures. The rollup-centric roadmap explicitly weakened the base layer. EIP-4844 went live on March 13, 2024. Blob base fees have been at or near 1 wei for most of 2024 and 2025. Ethereum's quarterly fee revenue is down about 95% from its Q4 2021 peak of $4.3 billion.

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (動區 BlockTempo)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items

2026-05-28

Standard Chartered: Ethereum is now like Amazon in 2001! ETH to hit $4,000 by year-end and $40,000 by 2030

Similarity 320%標的 ETH關鍵字 eth同分類 zh

2026-05-27

Bitmine massively bought 112,000 ETH in a single week! Tom Lee reiterates the crypto super cycle: Wall Street tokenization plus AI agents as dual engines

Similarity 320%標的 ETH關鍵字 eth同分類 zh

2026-05-27

Bankless Founder: Why I Sold My ETH

Similarity 320%標的 ETH關鍵字 eth同分類 zh

2026-05-26