Vitalik: Don't try to fight AI, but build a sanctuary for humans

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilaturaGemini 翻譯2595 words

In the a16z Podcast interview, Vitalik Buterin proposed the concept of "sanctuary technology," which is not about opposing AI, but about creating a parallel option that preserves privacy and sovereignty. He emphasized that in the AI era, humans should maintain "manual mode" to avoid brain atrophy and actively take the helm. (Context: The correct AI development Vitalik believes in: becoming a "mechanical exoskeleton" for human thought rather than an independent sentient life) (Background: When 90% of people in a DAO don't vote, Vitalik's solution is to give everyone an AI assistant) At a time when AI is reshaping the world at an astonishing speed, a core question is becoming increasingly difficult to avoid: Is there a way for humans to coexist with AI without being replaced? In the latest episode of the a16z Podcast, "Vitalik Buterin on Human Agency in the AI Era," Vitalik Buterin gave his clearest stance on AI yet: not opposition, not total surrender, but actively building a "sanctuary" for oneself. Vitalik pointed out the most dangerous cognitive inertia in the current world right from the start. He said directly in the interview: "The world we live in now is indeed less peaceful and less safe than it was ten or fifteen years ago." This uncertainty makes people instinctively look for a protector they can trust—whether it's a super AI company, Palantir, or the equivalent of some foreign government. Vitalik calls this psychology "trusting the uncle in the sky": "The price you pay for asking the uncle in the sky to fix everything is all your privacy and all your sovereignty." The core of the problem is not who that uncle is, but that once you hand over all your agency, you have no way back if that protective structure turns sour. Host Sophia Dew asked in the interview: Will this logic of "dis-empowering safety" be amplified to an unprecedented degree in the AI era? Vitalik's answer is: Of course, and this is exactly why he has re-evaluated the mission of Ethereum. Vitalik admitted in the interview that it took him a long time to truly figure out what Ethereum can and cannot do. He gave a direct example: "Crypto doesn't have the ability to fix the USD. Crypto has the ability to create something of its own, and that thing doesn't have some of the downsides of the USD." This distinction sounds subtle, but it is actually a fundamental cognitive shift. It is not about trying to hack or replace existing systems, but about building a parallel space on the side that one can freely enter and freely leave. He uses the word "sanctuary" to describe this design philosophy: "A sanctuary is not totalizing. A sanctuary is not the universe." It doesn't need to rule everything, nor does it need to convince everyone to join. Its existence is meant to provide a small space where people can truly retain privacy and sovereignty as the world becomes more dangerous and centralized. Ethereum's decentralized architecture and censorship-resistance have a more concrete interpretation in this context—not as technical idealism, but as the most direct engineering practice of having "a way out." In a rare moment during the interview, Vitalik looked back at the relatively private journey before the birth of Ethereum. At 19, he participated in a university co-op program and was preparing to intern at Ripple, but because the company had been established for less than a year, his visa never came through. This accidental off-term allowed him to travel the world as a writer for Bitcoin Magazine and visit Bitcoin communities everywhere. Later, he showed a proposal for improving MasterCoin to the team, and they said, "This will take a long time to do." Vitalik simply said: Then I'll do it myself. That proposal later became the Ethereum white paper. However, he admitted in the interview that throughout the process, he kept telling himself, "I'll go back to university in a few months," until January of the following year, when he saw that Ethereum had attracted a community scale that could not be ignored, he truly accepted that he would not be going back. He called this stage "living on autopilot," following the inertia of things without a deliberate decision. "Sometimes I would suddenly realize, wait, there is no other pilot at this moment." Host Binji Pande asked him in the interview what that turning point felt like, and Vitalik said it was a kind of "frightening clarity," but also the starting point of truly taking the helm. When the interview moved to the impact of AI tools on human cognition, an anonymous question from a listener made the atmosphere concrete and tense. The listener said: "I've been using Claude to write for six months, and my output has increased significantly. But at a meeting last week, I realized I couldn't think in real-

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (動區 BlockTempo)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching1 items

2026-05-18

Vitalik's latest article explores "formal verification": combining AI will be the final form of software development, endowing Ethereum with ultimate security.

Similarity 120%關鍵字 vitalik同分類 zh

💡 Currently matching via keywords + symbols (MVP) · Will be upgraded to embedding semantic search later

Raw Information

ID:188d508ad9

Source:動區 BlockTempo

Published:2026-05-18 02:53:32

Category:zh_news · Export Category zh

Symbols:Unspecified

Community Votes:+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 Important · 💬 0 Comments