News listMore than 100 crypto firms urge Senate to move on U.S. market structure bill
CoinDesk2026-04-23 09:30:00

More than 100 crypto firms urge Senate to move on U.S. market structure bill

AI Impact AnalysisGrok analyzing...
📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilatura3527 words
More than 100 crypto firms urge Senate to move on U.S. market structure bill Key priorities include defining clear SEC and CFTC oversight roles, protecting non-custodial developers, simplifying disclosure rules, and avoiding a patchwork of state laws. What to know: - A coalition of over 100 crypto firms, including Coinbase and Ripple, is pressing the Senate Banking Committee to mark up the Clarity Act to create a federal framework for digital assets. - Key priorities include defining clear SEC and CFTC oversight roles, protecting non-custodial developers, simplifying disclosure rules, and avoiding a patchwork of state laws. - The coalition warns the lack of a comprehensive U.S. crypto framework risks pushing investment and jobs offshore, urging Congress to set the global market standard. A coalition of U.S. crypto companies and trade groups called on the Senate Banking Committee to proceed with a markup of the Clarity Act, a bill that would create a federal framework for crypto markets. In a letter to Chairman Tim Scott, Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren Subcommittee Chairwoman Cynthia Lummis and Ranking Member Ruben Gallego, the group argued that action by government agencies alone cannot deliver stable rules. The letter cites the risk of returning to "regulation by enforcement," referring to a series of court cases brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) that defined policy under President Joe Biden. More than 100 signatories are backing the effort. These include high-profile companies including Coinbase, Circle Internet, Kraken, Ripple, Andreessen Horowitz, Paradigm, Consensys, Anchorage Digital and Galaxy Digital alongside developer groups, state blockchain associations and university chapters of Stand With Crypto. The coalition flagged six priorities for lawmakers to address. These include preserving consumer rewards tied to payment stablecoins, defining oversight roles for the SEC and CFTC, and protecting developers who build non-custodial tools. It also called for disclosure rules that are easier to follow and a federal standard that avoids a patchwork of state laws. Other major jurisdictions, such as the European Union, have already enacted comprehensive cryptocurrency frameworks, and the group warned that the absence of U.S. legislation risks pushing investment, jobs and development offshore. "America needs clear, comprehensive rules for digital asset markets. It is a global race to the top, and it is important for the U.S. to lead,” Ji Hun Kim, CEO of the Crypto Council for Innovation, in an email. “The Senate Banking Committee can build on years of bipartisan work and the GENIUS Act's success by advancing legislation that delivers regulatory clarity, robust consumer protections, and strong safeguards for developers. A markup will move us closer to durable rules that ensure the U.S. sets the global standard for digital asset markets,” Kim said. The Committee has not scheduled a markup. More For You The prediction market platform, which has been caught in the middle of a regulatory battle between the feds and the states, is seeking to demonstrate strong controls. What to know: - Prediction market platform Kalshi has again announced a collection of its own insider-trading cases — three politicians who bet on their own decision to seek office in Congress. - The firm detailed the cases, including a U.S. Senate candidate and former investment banker in Virginia who was on the reality series...
Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (CoinDesk)
🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items
💡 Currently matching via keywords + symbols (MVP) · Will be upgraded to embedding semantic search later
Raw Information
ID:31ed2563d6
Source:CoinDesk
Published:2026-04-23 09:30:00
Category:General · Export Category neutral
Symbols:Unspecified
Community Votes:+0 /0 · ⭐ 0 Important · 💬 0 Comments