After the Molotov cocktail attack: Altman talks about the cost of doomsday theories and takes a jab at Anthropic

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilaturaGemini 翻譯1475 words

A 20-year-old Texas man was arrested in April after throwing a firebomb at the San Francisco home of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, with a handwritten note listing the names and addresses of several AI executives found in his possession. Altman recently responded to the incident for the first time in a podcast interview. The 20-year-old man from Texas shocked the industry when he threw a firebomb at Altman’s residence on Chestnut Street in San Francisco around 3:00 AM on April 10. A handwritten note listing the names and addresses of several AI executives was found on Daniel Moreno-Gama when he was arrested by the FBI. Fortunately, the firebomb did not cause any casualties. About an hour later, Moreno-Gama appeared near the OpenAI headquarters in San Francisco, attempting to smash the door with a chair before being arrested by police. FBI agent Matt Cobo stated in a subsequent declaration: "This was not an impulsive act, but a planned, targeted, and extremely serious criminal act." Moreno-Gama currently faces charges including two counts of attempted murder, destruction of property using explosives, and possession of an unregistered firearm. More concerningly, this is not an isolated case. A report by Fortune in April noted that physical threats against AI executives and data centers are increasing, as anti-AI sentiment shifts from online debates to real-world actions. Following the incident, Altman said in an interview on the podcast Core Memory that he experienced a cycle of shock and frustration, trying to grasp the gravity of the situation on a practical level: "I know this kind of thing will happen again, and it is very discouraging." He also made a comment directed at specific targets: "I think the doomer rhetoric is not helpful. I think the way some other labs talk about us is also not helpful." Altman did not name names directly in the interview, but was clearer elsewhere: "The way Anthropic talks about OpenAI is not helpful." In a blog post, he described the competitive landscape as "Shakespearean drama between companies in the field," making the targets of his remarks easy to identify. Earlier, while criticizing Anthropic's Mythos model, he provided a more aggressive framework: "Saying you built a bomb, that you're going to drop it on someone's head, and then selling them a bunker for $100 million is clearly brilliant marketing." He characterized Mythos as "fear-based marketing," suggesting that Anthropic is leveraging the perceived dangers of their models to create a market monopoly. However, Altman’s claim that "doomer rhetoric is harmful" presents an unavoidable contradiction when placed alongside his own record of public statements. Over the past few years, he has frequently used language regarding the existential risks of AGI in public appearances and congressional hearings, comparing the potential dangers of artificial general intelligence to nuclear weapons, and publicly stating that he worries about the existential risks of AI every day. These statements, appearing in speeches, interviews, and policy advocacy, have served as arguments for regulation and as a core part of OpenAI's positioning. TechCrunch pointed out this contradiction directly in its report: "It is worth noting that Altman himself has been deeply involved in spreading similar doomsday messages, which makes his criticism of competitors appear more complicated." In the AI industry, almost every leading company has used the existential risk framework to some extent. Sometimes it is to push for regulation, sometimes to highlight their own importance, and sometimes out of genuine technical concern. This language has been circulating in the industry for a long time, and the boundaries are not clear. The question raised by the firebombing incident is far more complex than Altman’s accusations against Anthropic: When a set of doomsday rhetoric is transplanted from policy debates to the general public, does it also carry with it something far more dangerous?

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (動區 BlockTempo)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items

2026-04-23

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman slams Anthropic: Fear-mongering Claude Mythos is just to monopolize AI

2026-04-22

After being firebombed: Altman says doomerism fuels violence in the AI industry, then takes a jab at Anthropic

2026-04-23

Anthropic Using ‘Fear-Based Marketing’ to Promote Claude Mythos: Sam Altman

Similarity 130%關鍵字 anthropic/altman

2026-04-22

Bloomberg reveals Claude Mythos has been subject to unauthorized access! The hardest vulnerability for Anthropic to defend against will always be "people."

Similarity 120%關鍵字 anthropic同分類 zh