Coinbase advisory board says quantum computing threat is on the horizon, crypto needs a plan

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilatura4874 words

Coinbase advisory board says quantum computing threat is on the horizon, crypto needs a plan The 50-page paper concludes that while today’s blockchains remain secure, a future “fault-tolerant quantum computer” capable of breaking widely used encryption is increasingly plausible, and preparation must begin now. What to know: - A Coinbase-backed report warns that while quantum computers aren’t an immediate threat to crypto, the industry must start preparing now for a future where they could break current encryption. - Although post-quantum solutions exist, switching will be complex and costly, pushing major crypto ecosystems like Ethereum and Solana to begin exploring gradual transition strategies. A new report commissioned by Coinbase sounds a cautious, but urgent, alarm: Quantum computing won't break crypto tomorrow, but the industry can’t afford to wait. The 50-page paper, authored by an independent advisory board that includes prominent cryptographers and academics like Dan Boneh of Stanford University, Justin Drake of the Ethereum Foundation and Sreeram Kannan of Eigen Labs, concludes that while today’s blockchains remain secure, a future “fault-tolerant quantum computer” capable of breaking widely used encryption is increasingly plausible, and preparation must begin now. In recent months, concerns around quantum risk have moved further into the mainstream. Google researchers have published estimates suggesting that a sufficiently advanced quantum computer could one day break Bitcoin’s cryptography. Major crypto ecosystems have already started mapping out their responses. The Ethereum Foundation has proposed new types of digital signatures that are designed to be safe against quantum computers, while Solana and others are experimenting with quantum-resistant wallet designs. The report stresses that current quantum machines are far from powerful enough to crack the cryptography underpinning Bitcoin, Ethereum and other networks. Breaking standard encryption would require vast computational overhead, a milestone still considered a major engineering challenge. Still, the authors caution against complacency. “We have high confidence that a large-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer will eventually be built,” the report states, adding that the timeline is uncertain but “clearly on the horizon.” That uncertainty is exactly the problem, with estimates ranging from “a few years to a decade or more” and no reliable way to predict breakthroughs. The urgency is reflected in guidance from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which recommends migrating to quantum-resistant cryptography by 2035, a timeline the report suggests may even prove optimistic. “Waiting for it to be urgent is not a good idea,” the Coinbase paper says, emphasizing that transitions across blockchains, wallets and exchanges could take years to execute safely. Some assets may be more vulnerable than others. For example, Bitcoin wallets that have already revealed their public keys could be targeted, while those still protected behind hash functions may be safer in the short term. The good news: Quantum-resistant cryptography (PQC) already exists and is being standardized by NIST. The bad news: It’s not an easy swap. Post-quantum digital signatures can be tens to hundreds of times larger than current ones, which could dramatically increase blockchain data costs and reduce throughput. One estimate in the report suggests that replacing today’s signatures with quantum-proof alternatives could expand block sizes by up to 38 times. There are also usability challenges, from migrating millions of wallets to deciding what to do with “lost” or inactive funds that never upgrade. Rather than a single solution, the report outlines multiple transition strategies, including hybrid systems that combine existing cryptography with post-quantum updates or allow a gradual switch when needed. For now, the authors recommend flexible approaches that avoid sacrificing current security or performance while enabling a rapid upgrade later. “The time to begin preparing for it is now,” the report concludes. Read more: Solana's quantum-threat readiness reveals harsh tradeoff: security vs speed More For You More than $500 million was siphoned across the Drift and Kelp exploits in just over two weeks. What once looked like isolated breaches now resembles a sustained campaign, likely driven by the financial needs of a sanctioned state. What to know: - The Kelp exploit shows North Korea’s Lazarus Group is evolving beyond isolated hacks, rapidly shifting tactics from social engineering to exploiting structural weaknesses in crypto infrastructure, suggesting a sustained, state-driven campaign rather than one-off incidents. - The attack did not break cryptography but exploited known design choices and weak configurations, exposing...

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (CoinDesk)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items

2026-04-21

Coinbase Publishes First Paper on Quantum Computing Position for Crypto

2026-04-22

Coinbase highlights Algorand, Aptos' work to mitigate quantum threat

2026-04-21

Kalshi takes on Coinbase, Robinhood with new plan to offer crypto perpetual futures: The Information

Similarity 180%關鍵字 coinbase/crypto/plan

2026-04-20

The Quantum Threat Is Coming for Bitcoin and Crypto—Here's How XRP Ledger Is Preparing

2026-04-23