South Carolina Governor Signs Major Crypto Bill: Protects Self-Custody Wallets, Exempts Additional Taxes, Bans CBDC

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilaturaGemini 翻譯924 words

South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster signed S. 163 into law on Tuesday, amending state law to establish a comprehensive cryptocurrency regulatory framework. The legislation not only explicitly safeguards citizens' rights to hold and use digital assets, but also takes a firm stance against central bank digital currencies (CBDC). Defending Financial Autonomy Under the new law, the state government may not prohibit individuals or businesses from using cryptocurrency to pay for goods and services, nor may it restrict citizens from using "self-custody wallets" or "hardware wallets" to manage their own digital assets. In addition, the bill stipulates that any cryptocurrency transactions used for payment and consumption purposes shall, going forward, be exempt from any additional taxes, withholdings, or administrative fees imposed by South Carolina and its local governments, significantly lowering the barrier for virtual assets to enter everyday payments. Comprehensive Resistance to Central Bank Digital Currencies While warmly embracing decentralized assets, the bill shows strong rejection toward financial instruments led by the U.S. federal government. The "anti-CBDC" stance has become one of the most politically and financially talked-about focal points of this legislation. According to the bill, no government agency, commission, department, or local political subdivision in South Carolina may accept central bank digital currencies (CBDC) as a method of payment, nor may they compel citizens to use CBDC. The bill even explicitly states refusal to participate in any digital dollar pilot programs initiated by the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed). Mining, On-Chain Development, and Crypto-to-Crypto Trading Exempt from Money Transmitter Licensing Furthermore, the bill provides clear protections for cryptocurrency mining, prohibiting local governments from restricting mining operations within industrial zones. Unless in violation of local general noise pollution ordinances, local governments may not impose stricter decibel limits specifically targeting mining enterprises. Over the past few years, some U.S. states and local governments have imposed restrictions on Bitcoin mining operations over concerns about energy consumption, noise, and environmental disputes, triggering a prolonged tug-of-war between the industry and regulators. South Carolina's choice to directly legislate protections for the mining industry is seen as a continued friendly signal to the cryptocurrency sector. Additionally, S. 163 is the first to clarify in official statute the legal definitions of terms such as blockchain, digital assets, staking, nodes, and wallets. The bill also stipulates that engaging in core activities in South Carolina—such as mining, operating nodes, developing on-chain applications, or even simply conducting "crypto-to-crypto trading"—will all be exempt from applying for a Money Transmitter License, saving startup teams substantial compliance costs. In March of last year, Kentucky already led the way by passing House Bill 701, which similarly defended citizens' rights to use self-custody wallets and strictly prohibited local governments from enacting discriminatory regulations targeting the mining industry.

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (區塊客)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching0 items

No similar events found (requires more data samples or embedding search; currently MVP keyword matching)

Raw Information

ID:60cf67434e

Source:區塊客

Published:2026-05-20 07:51:07

Category:zh_news · Export Category zh

Symbols:Unspecified

Community Votes:+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 Important · 💬 0 Comments