Flight to safety: How Maker’s Spark and USDC are winning the $10 billion Aave breakup

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilatura3192 words

Flight to safety: How Maker’s Spark and USDC are winning the $10 billion Aave breakup Funds leaving Aave are splitting across safer lending, simpler ETH exposure and off-chain yield, with stablecoins acting as a temporary refuge. What to know: - More than $10 billion has left Aave since the $292 million Kelp DAO exploit, as impaired collateral and forced deleveraging drove users to unwind positions and withdraw funds. - Capital has fragmented across alternatives, with Maker-linked Spark, real-world asset protocols and major liquid staking platforms seeing modest inflows as users favor simpler, tightly risk-managed venues. - A sizable share of funds has moved into stablecoins such as USDC or been used to repay loans, signaling a broader pullback from complex shared-collateral and cross-chain structures rather than a shift to a single new platform. Over $10 billion has exited Aave after the Kelp DAO exploit, but the capital hasn't all gone to one place. After the roughly $292 million exploit broke the cross-chain backing of rsETH, users have spread capital across safer, simpler venues rather than rotating into a direct replacement. Aave’s total value locked has fallen about 40%, according to DeFiLlama data, as impaired collateral triggered market freezes, stalled liquidations, and forced deleveraging, pushing users to withdraw or close positions. Some of that capital has moved into Maker-linked Spark, which has emerged as the clearest relative winner. Its TVL has risen around 10% as users rotate toward infrastructure backed by Sky’s $6.5 Billion stablecoin reserves, favoring tighter risk controls over open-ended lending markets exposed to complex collateral. Elsewhere, large liquid staking providers like Lido have held relatively steady. That stability suggests users are not abandoning ETH exposure, but stripping out layers of risk tied to restaking, rehypothecation and cross-chain bridges. A third pocket of inflows is showing up in real-world asset protocols such as Centrifuge and Spiko, which both offer exposure to tokenized assets like T-bills and bonds. At the same time, a significant share of funds has moved into stablecoins, particularly USDC, as users step out of risk and wait on the sidelines rather than immediately redeploying capital. Not all of Aave’s decline reflects capital rotation. Part of the drop comes from loans being repaid and positions unwound, mechanically shrinking TVL without a new destination. The result is a fragmented market response. Capital is flowing toward simplicity, controlled risk and even cash, suggesting that after Kelp, confidence in shared collateral layers has weakened rather than shifted elsewhere. More For You Polymarket prices low odds of a system-wide redistribution, as the protocol weighs how to handle an undercollateralized rsETH supply What to know: - A Polymarket contract suggests only a 14% chance that Kelp DAO will spread the losses from the $292 million rsETH exploit across all holders. - The hack drained about 116,500 rsETH from a LayerZero-powered bridge spanning more than 20 blockchains, leaving some rsETH undercollateralized and certain users effectively holding partially unbacked...

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (CoinDesk)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items

2026-04-29

Circle Mints $500 Million in USDC on Solana as Weekly Issuance Tops $3.25 Billion

Similarity 330%標的 USDC關鍵字 usdc/billion

2026-04-23

Circle Economist Proposes 50% Rate Ceiling to Snap Aave's USDC Liquidity Crisis

Similarity 330%標的 USDC關鍵字 usdc/aave

2026-04-23

Circle Economist Proposes Higher USDC Rates on Aave V3 After KelpDAO Exploit

Similarity 330%標的 USDC關鍵字 usdc/aave

2026-04-22