AI mention met with boos! US graduates seek solace by shaming CEOs

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilaturaGemini 翻譯1306 words

During the 2026 U.S. graduation ceremony season, multiple speakers — including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt and Big Machine Records CEO Scott Borchetta — were interrupted by boos from students the moment they mentioned AI, with this pattern recurring consistently across multiple campuses. (Background: Customer service, secretarial, and sales job openings have shrunk for two consecutive years: according to the latest U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data, AI is replacing these 17 occupations) (Additional context: Standard Chartered Bank announced it will cut 15% of its back-office staff by 2030! The CEO openly admitted: using AI to replace "low-value labor") Multiple campuses, multiple speakers, the same trigger point: as soon as someone on stage opens their mouth to say "AI will change everything," neat, organized discontent immediately erupts from the audience. In May in the United States, a rare sound emerged at graduation ceremonies — not cheers, but boos. This was not the sporadic behavior of a few angry youths, but a recurring reaction across campuses and across events. At graduation ceremonies, which are supposed to be inspiring occasions, Gen Z chose this way to make a public statement. On May 8, at the University of Central Florida (UCF) graduation ceremony, real estate executive Gloria Caulfield said "the rise of artificial intelligence is the next industrial revolution," and the boos barely let her finish. A day later, at Middle Tennessee State University, Scott Borchetta, CEO of major record label Big Machine Records, said "AI is rewriting the entire industry's production model," and the reaction was identical. The most ironic scene took place at Glendale Community College in Arizona: the school had introduced an AI voice system to read out graduates' names, and the system failed midway through the ceremony. The president walked on stage to explain, "We've introduced a new AI system," and before the words were out, the boos rang out. Not because of the malfunction, but because of the sentence itself. But the most closely watched was former Google CEO Eric Schmidt's remarks at the University of Arizona. He said AI "will touch every profession, every classroom, every hospital, every laboratory, every relationship of every person." The boos rang out before he had finished speaking. The common structure of these scenes is: a named, prominent leader delivers a sentence of AI inevitability narrative, and is then negated, with their voices, by young entrants to the job market. To understand these boos, one needs to compare two sets of numbers. The first set: ServiceNow CEO Bill McDermott predicted at an investor conference in San Francisco's Silicon Valley in March that, after AI massively absorbs entry-level white-collar jobs, the unemployment rate for new college graduates could reach 30% within two years. This is a specific prediction targeting the cohort just out of college, not a vague "the future of work will change." The second set: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data shows that entry-level job categories such as customer service, secretarial work, and sales assistants have seen job openings shrink for two consecutive years. This is not a trend forecast, but a present tense that is already happening. Placing these two sets of numbers together explains why students in the audience, upon hearing "AI is the next industrial revolution," do not feel inspired, but feel offended. The term "industrial revolution" is laudatory in history textbooks, but for the class of 2026, it signifies a poorly timed transition: the revolution is happening at the exact moment they are about to enter the workforce, and their position is precisely the layer most easily replaced. NextWeb's commentary was direct: "Gen Z is not booing AI; they are booing their own job market." Fortune called it "cognitive dissonance": they are angry that AI is taking their job opportunities, yet they clearly know that without using AI tools, they cannot even pass an interview. This is a two-way dilemma: those who oppose the technology must rely on this very technology to survive.

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (動區 BlockTempo)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items

2026-05-26

Ondo Finance founder Nathan Allman passes away suddenly at age 32! Incoming CEO declares: His mission will not change

Similarity 120%關鍵字 ceo同分類 zh

2026-05-25

Caught up in another $850 million Iranian fund flow controversy! WSJ adds more revelations, Binance CEO refutes "inaccurate reporting"

Similarity 120%關鍵字 ceo同分類 zh

2026-05-22

The Era of the One-Person Company Has Arrived! Anthropic Releases "AI-Native Entrepreneurship Handbook": You Can Be a Tech CEO Even Without Coding Skills

Similarity 120%關鍵字 ceo同分類 zh

2026-05-22