Litecoin says 13-block reorg was not a 'zero-day' attack, GitHub commit history shows otherwise

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilatura5231 words

Litecoin says 13-block reorg was not a 'zero-day' attack, GitHub commit history shows otherwise Litecoin's foundation called the weekend exploit a zero-day. The litecoin-project GitHub repository shows the consensus vulnerability was privately patched between March 19 and 26, more than four weeks before the attack. What to know: - Attackers exploited a previously patched but not fully deployed vulnerability in Litecoin’s Mimblewimble Extension Block protocol, triggering a 13-block chain reorganization that rewound about 32 minutes of activity. - Public GitHub commits show the core consensus bug was privately fixed weeks before the exploit, creating a window in which some mining pools ran updated code while others remained vulnerable, a gap researchers say the attackers appeared to target. - The Litecoin network ultimately reorganized back to the valid chain once denial-of-service attacks on patched miners ceased, but the foundation has not yet explained the patch timeline or disclosed how much LTC was affected during the invalid block window. A 13-block chain reorganization on The bug had enabled a denial-of-service attack against major mining pools, allowing the invalid MWEB transactions to slip through nodes that had not updated, before the network's longest valid chain corrected them. Litecoin Core v0.21.5.4 released! All users are advised to upgrade. This release contains important security updates. https://t.co/6vtrhdXi4c — Litecoin (@litecoin) April 25, 2026 The Foundation said in Asian morning hours on Sunday the bug was fully patched and the network is operating normally. However, prominent researchers say the litecoin-project GitHub repository tells a different story. Security researcher bbsz, who works with the SEAL911 emergency response group for crypto exploits, posted the patch timeline pulled from the public commit log. Now that stuff has been made public on the Litecoin GitHub, we have a better sense of timeline and what happened. — bbsz (@blackbigswan) April 26, 2026 In the age of Mythos, this timeline simply doesn't fly. The post-mortem says one zero-day caused a DoS that let an invalid MWEB tx slip through. The git log on… https://t.co/zMMrheQLPP pic.twitter.com/O3DtdwV0rF The consensus vulnerability that allowed the invalid MWEB peg-out was privately patched between March 19 and March 26, roughly four weeks before the attack. A separate denial-of-service vulnerability was patched on the morning of April 25. Both fixes were rolled into release 0.21.5.4 the same afternoon, after the attack had already begun. "The post-mortem says one zero-day caused a DoS that let an invalid MWEB transaction slip through," bbsz wrote. "The git log tells a slightly different story." A zero-day refers to a vulnerability unknown to defenders at the time of an attack. Litecoin's commit history shows the consensus vulnerability was known and patched privately a month before the exploit, but the fix had not been broadcast publicly or required to all mining pools. That created a window where some miners ran the patched code while others ran the still-vulnerable version, and the attackers appear to have known which was which. Alex Shevchenko, CTO of NEAR Foundation's Aurora project, raised parallel concerns in a thread. Blockchain data showed the attacker pre-funded a wallet 38 hours before the exploit through a Binance withdrawal, with the destination address already configured to swap LTC into ETH on a decentralized exchange. The denial-of-service attack and the MWEB bug were separate components, Shevchenko argued, with the DoS designed to take patched mining nodes offline so the unpatched ones would form the chain that included the invalid transactions. The fact that the network automatically handled the 13-block reorganization once the DoS stopped suggests enough hashrate was running updated code to eventually overpower the attack, but only after the unpatched fork had run for 32 minutes. A hit on Litecoin shows how attacks on various networks differ in how code maintainers and developers react to exploits. Newer chains with smaller, more centralized validator sets coordinate upgrades through chat groups and can push patches network-wide in hours. Older proof-of-work networks like Litecoin and bitcoin rely on independent mining pools choosing when to upgrade, which works for non-urgent changes but creates a window of vulnerability when a security patch needs to reach everyone before an attacker exploits the gap. The Litecoin Foundation has not publicly addressed the GitHub timeline as of Sunday morning. The amount of LTC pegged out during the invalid block window and the value of any swaps completed before the reorganization reversed them have not been disclosed. More For You IBIT options open interest topped Deribit on Friday, signaling rapid institutional adoption of regulated crypto derivatives in the U.S. What to know: - IBIT options open interest topped Deribit on Friday, signaling rapid institutional adoption of regulated crypto derivatives in the U.S. - Positioning differs across markets: IBIT flows appear slightly more bullish than Deribit's BTC options. - Despite similar scale, IBIT and Deribit cater to different investor bases.

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (CoinDesk)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items

2026-04-26

Litecoin says its 13-block reorg was not a 'zero-day, but GitHub commit history shows otherwise

2026-04-25

Litecoin Confirms Zero-Day Bug Caused 13-Block Reorg, Network Patched and Stable

Similarity 280%關鍵字 day/litecoin/reorg

2026-04-26

Litecoin gives post-attack update, but other devs doubt zero-day theory

Similarity 230%關鍵字 zero/litecoin/attack

2026-04-26

Litecoin X Account Tells Critics to ‘Stay on the Shallow End’ After 13-Block Reorg