拯救中本聰的 110 萬枚比特幣！Paradigm 提抗量子新方案「PACTs」，免轉帳即可證明資產控制權

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自動擷取Gemini 翻譯1485 字

Is Bitcoin's quantum crisis solvable? As the threat of quantum computing looms, the 1.1 million BTC held by Satoshi Nakamoto face a dilemma: being hacked or being forcibly frozen by the community. In response, the top-tier VC firm Paradigm has proposed a new architecture called "PACTs," allowing early whales to privately prove asset control using zero-knowledge proofs (STARK) and timestamping technology without moving funds or exposing their identities. However, this mechanism still has an unavoidable flaw: Satoshi Nakamoto must personally step forward to perform the operation; otherwise, these ancient BTC remain destined to be locked forever. (Previous coverage: Don't fear quantum computers breaking Bitcoin! Analyst: If $145 billion in BTC were hacked, the market could fully absorb it) (Background: Solana releases anti-quantum upgrade roadmap: Two major clients lock in Falcon scheme, ready to adopt post-quantum signature schemes at any time) With the rapid development of quantum computers, the Bitcoin community is facing a multi-billion dollar ultimate challenge: how to protect those ancient wallets with exposed public keys that have remained unmoved for years? The biggest ticking time bomb is the approximately 1.1 million BTC held by Satoshi Nakamoto (currently valued at about $84 billion). To defend against quantum hackers, Bitcoin core developer Jameson Lopp and five others proposed BIP-361 in mid-April. The proposal suggests a soft fork to gradually phase out quantum-vulnerable legacy addresses within 5 years; if holders do not transfer their funds to quantum-resistant addresses within the deadline, their BTC will be permanently frozen. However, this proposal has sparked massive controversy. It implies that Satoshi Nakamoto and all early holders of long-dormant coins would be forced to "publicly wake up" their wallets and transfer assets, or else lose their property entirely. This creates an extreme, binary deadlock between protecting network security and respecting dormant property rights. To resolve this dilemma, Dan Robinson, a General Partner at the VC firm Paradigm, released a new design on Friday called "Provable Address-Control Timestamps (PACTs)." The core concept of PACTs is elegant: there is no need to move tokens; one only needs to leave a timestamped proof of ownership before a specific date, which remains completely private to the public until the funds are actually spent. The specific operational process is as follows: - Private proof generation: The holder generates a random Salt (used to ensure the uniqueness and unpredictability of the cryptographic commitment) and uses the BIP-322 standard (signing messages from a Bitcoin address without spending) to generate a proof of ownership. - On-chain timestamping: The Salt and proof are bundled into an on-chain commitment and anchored to the Bitcoin blockchain via the free service OpenTimestamps. During this stage, all files and timestamps remain absolutely private. - Quantum-resistant unlocking: If Bitcoin eventually implements a soft fork to freeze legacy coins, the PACTs protocol will provide a "rescue channel." When holders need to spend, they simply submit a STARK proof (a quantum-resistant zero-knowledge proof) to demonstrate that they completed the commitment before quantum hardware became available. The strength of this mechanism is that the redemption process "does not leak the original address, the amount, or even the specific time the timestamp was created." Although PACTs provides a perfect buffer solution for the forced freezing of BIP-361, Robinson admits that this mechanism still has a long way to go before practical application. First, the Bitcoin network currently lacks the infrastructure for STARK verification, which would require an independent soft fork to build community consensus and extensive modifications to the underlying pipeline (including multi-signature, complex scripts, and hardware wallet support). More importantly, PACTs cannot solve an ultimate philosophical and practical problem: the protocol can only protect assets if "Satoshi Nakamoto himself" or the person currently holding those private keys personally makes the commitment. If Satoshi Nakamoto has passed away or the private keys are lost forever, no PACTs can be retroactively created. This means these 1.1 million BTC will ultimately face one of two fates: either being brute-forced and stolen by a quantum computer, or being permanently locked by a Bitcoin community soft fork.

資料狀態✓ 已擷取全文閱讀原文（動區 BlockTempo）

🔍歷史類似事件· 關鍵字 + 標的比對6 則

2026-04-30

比特幣衝擊 8 萬美元遇阻！衍生品閃爍避險紅燈、巨鯨押注 BTC 跌向 6.5 萬

相似度 240%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-04-29

21Shares 投資長：Bitcoin「流動性媲美 Nvidia」年底上看 10 萬美元！傳統「山寨季」恐成絕響

相似度 240%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-04-29

Michael Saylor 在 Bitcoin 2026演講：9 個月STRC 登全球最大優先股、夏普比完勝 Nvidia

相似度 240%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-04-29

白宮顧問 Patrick Witt：BTC 戰略儲備「幾周內」公告，但法律框架仍須國會立法保障

相似度 240%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-04-29

免費比特幣來了！Tether 宣布啟動比特幣水龍頭，下載錢包發推即可獲得空投 BTC

相似度 240%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-04-28

Arthur Hayes：AI 就是新次貸風暴，市場敘事從通縮轉戰爭通膨，比特幣年底衝 12.5 萬美元

相似度 240%標的 BTC同分類 zh

💡 目前用關鍵字 + 標的比對（MVP）· 之後會升級為 embedding 語意搜尋

原始資訊

ID：519d77d2eb

來源：動區 BlockTempo

發佈：2026-05-02 06:45:33

分類：zh_news · 導出分類 zh

標的：BTC

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 重要 · 💬 0 留言