量子電腦攻破比特幣也別怕！分析師：1450 億美元 BTC 若遭駭，市場完全能消化

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自動擷取Gemini 翻譯1439 字

Will quantum computing destroy Bitcoin? Market data tells you: Don't panic! As quantum computing technology evolves, concerns about cracking early Bitcoin (Satoshi-era) wallets have resurfaced. It is estimated that approximately 1.7 million BTC, worth as much as $145 billion, are at risk of being stolen. However, analysts point out that compared to the massive liquidity of today's Bitcoin market, the market is absolutely capable of absorbing this potential selling pressure within a few months, and it does not constitute an "existential threat." The real challenge actually lies in community governance. (Previous coverage: Cardano founder slams Bitcoin's quantum defense as a "fake soft fork": BIP-361 freezing Satoshi's million BTC is a hard fork) (Background: As the quantum era approaches, should we freeze Satoshi's 1.7 million BTC or stick to the belief in decentralization?) Breakthroughs in Quantum computing technology have once again awakened a long-standing fear in the crypto market: If quantum computers become powerful enough to crack Bitcoin's cryptography, will the market collapse? According to Bitcoin analyst James Check, in theory, a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could indeed crack Bitcoin's elliptic curve signatures. This would put addresses that have exposed their public keys, especially early "Satoshi-era" wallets, at extreme risk. "Doomers" warn that this would release a massive supply of Bitcoin, completely destroying the market. However, when we lay out the actual market data, the situation does not seem as pessimistic as imagined. The threat of Quantum computing is real. According to statistics, approximately 1.7 million BTC are stored in these potentially vulnerable early addresses. At current prices, this represents a potential selling pressure of up to $145 billion. This number sounds devastating, but given today's market depth, it is actually manageable. Here are some key liquidity data comparisons: - Regular bull market sell-offs: In a bull market, long-term holders (investors who have held coins for more than 155 days) typically release 10,000 to 30,000 BTC into the market daily. At this rate, this 1.7 million ancient supply is roughly equivalent to 2 to 3 months of regular "profit-taking" volume. - Bear market turnover: In the most recent bear market, more than 2.3 million BTC changed hands in a single quarter. This far exceeds the potential "total target" of a quantum attack, and the market did not experience a systemic collapse at that time. - Exchange and derivatives liquidity: Currently, monthly inflows to exchanges are close to 850,000 BTC; and in the derivatives market, a notional trading volume equivalent to the entire Satoshi-era treasure is generated every few days. In short, while $145 billion looks huge when viewed in isolation, it becomes relatively ordinary market volatility when placed within Bitcoin's existing liquidity and turnover. The market would absorb this scale of supply in terms of "months," not "years." Of course, a concentrated release of a large number of chips in a short period would still have an impact. James Check admits that this could exacerbate volatility and potentially trigger a prolonged downturn. But the assumption of a "devastating dump" is based on extremely irrational economic behavior. Any entity capable of acquiring this massive treasure (whether it is a state-level hacker organization or a top-tier institution) has the ultimate goal of making a profit. To maximize profits and reduce Slippage, they have an absolute incentive to choose to "sell in batches" or even hedge through the derivatives market, rather than dumping everything at once and causing their assets to shrink significantly. Therefore, the core issue of the quantum threat is not mechanical selling pressure, but "Governance." The report concludes by pointing out that more controversial than a market crash is whether the Bitcoin community should take action. For example, should proposals like BIP-361 be implemented to forcibly "freeze" these Satoshi-era ancient coins to prevent quantum theft? Or should the iron law of Bitcoin's "censorship-resistant" decentralization be upheld, allowing market mechanisms to operate naturally? This is the ultimate test that Bitcoin believers must face when the quantum era arrives.

資料狀態✓ 已擷取全文閱讀原文（動區 BlockTempo）

🔍歷史類似事件· 關鍵字 + 標的比對6 則

2026-04-20

79 億美元 BTC 選擇權將到期！市場緊盯「2 關鍵價位」、最大痛點在 7.1 萬美元

相似度 370%標的 BTC關鍵字億美元/btc同分類 zh

2026-04-22

聯邦銀行 × MaiCoin 推出「U 幣聯名卡」刷卡最高 4.5% 回饋，直接兌 BTC、ETH、USDT

相似度 320%標的 BTC關鍵字 btc同分類 zh

2026-04-21

法國歹徒偽裝假警察，持刀逼巴黎 50 多歲夫妻轉出 100 萬鎂 BTC

相似度 320%標的 BTC關鍵字 btc同分類 zh

2026-04-21

史上最強詐騙集團「假冒伊朗」收 BTC 通關海峽費，受騙油輪可能挨槍了

相似度 320%標的 BTC關鍵字 btc同分類 zh

2026-04-23

在 BTC 價格未能重回 $80K 後，市場焦點轉向 Bitcoin 週線收盤

相似度 280%標的 BTC關鍵字 btc

2026-04-23

隨著 BTC 逼近 80,000 美元，BlackRock 推動 Bitcoin ETF 實現 7 日資金淨流入

相似度 280%標的 BTC關鍵字 btc

💡 目前用關鍵字 + 標的比對（MVP）· 之後會升級為 embedding 語意搜尋

原始資訊

ID：69877e43b4

來源：動區 BlockTempo

發佈：2026-04-23 13:14:20

分類：zh_news · 導出分類 zh

標的：BTC

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 重要 · 💬 0 留言