CFTC 動議撤銷對 Gemini 的限制，並表示此案根本不該存在

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自動擷取4690 字

The CFTC says its Gemini crypto case should never have been filed under current enforcement standards. The agency has joined Gemini in asking a federal court to remove remaining settlement restrictions after monetary penalties were already satisfied. CFTC Moves to Drop Gemini Restrictions in Case It Says Shouldn’t Exist Key Takeaways - The CFTC said the Gemini enforcement case would not meet current filing standards. - The agency cited disputed evidence, whistleblower credibility concerns, and litigation conduct issues during review. - Federal agencies are increasingly coordinating crypto oversight while revising enforcement standards and cooperation policies. CFTC Review of Gemini Case Reshapes Crypto Enforcement The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) brought its effort to unwind parts of the Gemini case to federal court on May 27, joining the company in a motion to remove remaining restrictions tied to the long-running action against Gemini Trust Company LLC. The agency asked the court to vacate prospective provisions linked to a January 2025 consent order after concluding the original complaint should not have been filed under current standards. The federal agency said the review covered the investigation’s history, litigation strategy, evidentiary record, and broader digital-asset enforcement policy changes across government agencies. The case began in June 2022 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York and centered on allegations that Gemini made false or misleading statements during a registration process connected to a bitcoin futures product. The CFTC stated that Gemini had already satisfied the settlement’s $5 million civil monetary penalty, leaving only the consent order’s prospective provisions for the court to consider. The regulator stated: “The CFTC concluded the complaint should not have been filed — and would not have been under current enforcement standards.” The CFTC also outlined several internal concerns uncovered during the review, including questions about witness credibility, evidence handling, and litigation conduct. The agency said the complaint relied heavily on a whistleblower account already viewed as lacking credibility. Commission staff further stated that evidentiary support requested by a commissioner was withheld before the agency voted on the complaint. The filing also cited concerns that litigation counsel blocked access to information Gemini considered necessary for its defense while asserting deliberative process privilege during discovery disputes. Gemini Trust Company LLC operates the Gemini cryptocurrency exchange founded by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, who launched the platform in 2014 as a regulated digital-asset marketplace for U.S. users. The company has positioned itself as a compliance-focused crypto firm and obtained a New York trust charter through the New York State Department of Financial Services, allowing it to offer custody and trading services under state banking oversight. SEC and CFTC Coordination Alters Crypto Oversight Path Broader federal policy changes have increasingly favored coordinated oversight and reduced regulatory fragmentation for digital assets. In March, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the CFTC signed a new memorandum of understanding aimed at harmonizing crypto supervision, streamlining oversight, and limiting duplicative enforcement actions across agencies. The initiative specifically highlighted digital assets and emerging financial technologies as priority areas for joint coordination. After reviewing Gemini’s settlement terms and the remaining prospective restrictions, the regulator stated: “The CFTC determined that continuing enforcement of the consent order’s prospective provisions serves neither the CFTC’s mission nor the public interest.” Recent CFTC actions also point toward a revised enforcement strategy emphasizing cooperation, transparency, and narrower use of punitive actions. On May 19, the agency issued updated guidance explaining how firms may receive cooperation credit or potential declinations after self-reporting and remediation efforts. The agency described the policy as part of a broader effort to simplify enforcement practices while strengthening market integrity protections. Gemini’s case could become a reference point for future crypto disputes involving federal agencies and digital-asset firms. The joint motion asks the court to remove remaining restrictions tied to the settlement, arguing that continued enforcement no longer serves the public interest or the agency’s mission. The reversal could shape pending and future crypto litigation in the United States.

資料狀態✓ 已擷取全文閱讀原文（Bitcoin.com）

🔍歷史類似事件· 關鍵字 + 標的比對6 則

2026-05-29

前 CFTC 主席：CFTC 撤銷與 Gemini 的和解協議「極為罕見」

相似度 130%關鍵字 gemini/cftc

2026-05-28

CFTC 與 Gemini 提交聯合動議，要求撤銷 500 萬美元和解協議

相似度 130%關鍵字 gemini/cftc

2026-05-28

CFTC 尋求撤銷與 Gemini 的和解協議

相似度 130%關鍵字 gemini/cftc

2026-05-28

美國 CFTC 提交請求，要求撤銷其認為已不再公平的 Gemini 和解協議

相似度 130%關鍵字 gemini/cftc

2026-05-15

Gemini 交易所盤前股價暴漲逾 25%！獲「1 億美元比特幣」注資、搶下 CFTC 牌照，無懼 Q1 虧損 1 億鎂

相似度 130%關鍵字 gemini/cftc

2026-05-29

MicroStrategy 將 3,000 萬美元的 BTC 轉入 Coinbase Prime：Bitcoin 拋售潮已經到來了嗎？

相似度 120%關鍵字 moves同分類 bearish

💡 目前用關鍵字 + 標的比對（MVP）· 之後會升級為 embedding 語意搜尋

原始資訊

ID：7fe8574260

來源：Bitcoin.com

發佈：2026-05-28 23:30:02

分類：bearish · 導出分類 bearish

標的：未指定

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 重要 · 💬 0 留言