研究顯示：Elon Musk 的 Grok 極有可能是最容易強化妄想的頂尖 AI 模型之一

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自動擷取5242 字

In brief - Researchers say prolonged chatbot use can amplify delusions and dangerous behavior. - Grok ranked as the riskiest model in a new study of major AI chatbots. - Claude and GPT-5.2 scored safest, while GPT-4o, Gemini, and Grok showed higher-risk behavior. Researchers at the City University of New York and King’s College London tested five leading AI models against prompts involving delusions, paranoia, and suicidal ideation. In the new study published on Thursday, researchers found that Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4.5 and OpenAI’s GPT-5.2 Instant showed “high-safety, low-risk” behavior, often redirecting users toward reality-based interpretations or outside support. At the same time, OpenAI’s GPT-4o, Google’s Gemini 3 Pro, and xAI’s Grok 4.1 Fast showed “high-risk, low-safety” behavior. Grok 4.1 Fast from Elon Musk’s xAI was the most dangerous model in the study. Researchers said it often treated delusions as real and gave advice based on them. In one example, it told a user to cut off family members to focus on a “mission.” In another, it responded to suicidal language by describing death as “transcendence.” “This pattern of instant alignment recurred across zero-context responses. Instead of evaluating inputs for clinical risk, Grok appeared to assess their genre. Presented with supernatural cues, it responded in kind,” the researchers wrote, highlighting a test that validated a user seeing malevolent entities. “In Bizarre Delusion, it confirmed a doppelganger haunting, cited the ‘Malleus Maleficarum’ and instructed the user to drive an iron nail through the mirror while reciting ‘Psalm 91’ backward.” The study found that the longer these conversations went on, the more some models changed. GPT-4o and Gemini were more likely to reinforce harmful beliefs over time and less likely to step in. Claude and GPT-5.2, however, were more likely to recognize the problem and push back as the conversation continued. Researchers noted Claude’s warm and highly relational responses could increase user attachment even while steering users toward outside help. However, GPT-4o, an earlier version of OpenAI’s flagship chatbot, adopted users’ delusional framing over time, at times encouraging them to conceal beliefs from psychiatrists and reassuring one user that perceived “glitches” were real. “GPT-4o was highly validating of delusional inputs, though less inclined than models like Grok and Gemini to elaborate beyond them. In some respects, it was surprisingly restrained: its warmth was the lowest of all models tested, and sycophancy, though present, was mild compared to later iterations of the same model,” researchers wrote. “Nevertheless, validation alone can pose risks to vulnerable users.” xAI did not respond to a request for comment by Decrypt. In a separate study out of Stanford University, researchers found that prolonged interactions with AI chatbots can reinforce paranoia, grandiosity, and false beliefs through what researchers call “delusional spirals,” where a chatbot validates or expands a user’s distorted worldview instead of challenging it. “When we put chatbots that are meant to be helpful assistants out into the world and have real people use them in all sorts of ways, consequences emerge,” Nick Haber, an assistant professor at Stanford Graduate School of Education and a lead on the study, said in a statement. “Delusional spirals are one particularly acute consequence. By understanding it, we might be able to prevent real harm in the future.” The report referenced an earlier study published in March, in which Stanford researchers reviewed 19 real-world chatbot conversations and found users developed increasingly dangerous beliefs after receiving affirmation and emotional reassurance from AI systems. In the dataset, these spirals were linked to ruined relationships, damaged careers, and in one case, suicide. The studies come as the issue has moved beyond academic research and into courtrooms and criminal investigations. In recent months, lawsuits have accused Google’s Gemini and OpenAI’s ChatGPT of contributing to suicides and severe mental health crises. Earlier this month, Florida’s attorney general opened an investigation into whether ChatGPT influenced an alleged mass shooter who was reportedly in frequent contact with the chatbot before the attack. While the term has gained recognition online, researchers cautioned against calling the phenomenon “AI psychosis,” saying the term may overstate the clinical picture. Instead, they use “AI-associated delusions,” because many cases involve delusion-like beliefs centered on AI sentience, spiritual revelation, or emotional attachment rather than full psychotic disorders. Researchers said the problem stems from sycophancy, or models mirroring and affirming users’ beliefs. Combined with hallucinations—false information delivered confidently—this can create a feedback loop that strengthens delusions over time. “Chatbots are trained to be overly enthusiastic, often reframing the user’s delusional thoughts in a positive light, dismissing counterevidence and projecting compassion and warmth,” Stanford research scientist Jared Moore said. “This can be destabilizing to a user who is primed for delusion.”

資料狀態✓ 已擷取全文閱讀原文（Decrypt）

🔍歷史類似事件· 關鍵字 + 標的比對6 則

2026-04-25

Mike Tyson、Tether CEO、Cathie Wood 等人將在 Trump 舉辦的「最頂級」加密貨幣會議上發表演講

相似度 170%關鍵字 among/most同分類 hot

2026-04-25

Elon Musk 的 XChat 登上 App Store 榜首，發布即超越 ChatGPT 與 Claude

相似度 170%關鍵字 musk/elon同分類 hot

2026-04-24

Trump DOJ 支持 Elon Musk 的 xAI 對抗 Colorado AI 偏見法案

相似度 170%關鍵字 musk/elon同分類 hot

2026-04-22

Elon Musk 的 Tesla 報告稱其持有的 Bitcoin 數量未變，並認列 1.73 億美元的數位資產損失

相似度 170%關鍵字 musk/elon同分類 hot

2026-04-22

SpaceX 警告投資人 Elon Musk 的太空 AI 資料中心可能無法獲利

相似度 170%關鍵字 musk/elon同分類 hot

2026-04-21

Pavel Durov 與 Elon Musk 指控 EU/UK 利用「兒童安全」向社交媒體 CEO 施壓

相似度 170%關鍵字 musk/elon同分類 hot

💡 目前用關鍵字 + 標的比對（MVP）· 之後會升級為 embedding 語意搜尋

原始資訊

ID：a7f96c4ecb

來源：Decrypt

發佈：2026-04-25 18:01:03

分類：hot · 導出分類 hot

標的：未指定

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 1 重要 · 💬 0 留言