Litecoin 表示 13 個區塊的重組並非「zero-day」攻擊，但 GitHub 提交歷史顯示情況並非如此

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自動擷取5231 字

Litecoin says 13-block reorg was not a 'zero-day' attack, GitHub commit history shows otherwise Litecoin's foundation called the weekend exploit a zero-day. The litecoin-project GitHub repository shows the consensus vulnerability was privately patched between March 19 and 26, more than four weeks before the attack. What to know: - Attackers exploited a previously patched but not fully deployed vulnerability in Litecoin’s Mimblewimble Extension Block protocol, triggering a 13-block chain reorganization that rewound about 32 minutes of activity. - Public GitHub commits show the core consensus bug was privately fixed weeks before the exploit, creating a window in which some mining pools ran updated code while others remained vulnerable, a gap researchers say the attackers appeared to target. - The Litecoin network ultimately reorganized back to the valid chain once denial-of-service attacks on patched miners ceased, but the foundation has not yet explained the patch timeline or disclosed how much LTC was affected during the invalid block window. A 13-block chain reorganization on The bug had enabled a denial-of-service attack against major mining pools, allowing the invalid MWEB transactions to slip through nodes that had not updated, before the network's longest valid chain corrected them. Litecoin Core v0.21.5.4 released! All users are advised to upgrade. This release contains important security updates. https://t.co/6vtrhdXi4c — Litecoin (@litecoin) April 25, 2026 The Foundation said in Asian morning hours on Sunday the bug was fully patched and the network is operating normally. However, prominent researchers say the litecoin-project GitHub repository tells a different story. Security researcher bbsz, who works with the SEAL911 emergency response group for crypto exploits, posted the patch timeline pulled from the public commit log. Now that stuff has been made public on the Litecoin GitHub, we have a better sense of timeline and what happened. — bbsz (@blackbigswan) April 26, 2026 In the age of Mythos, this timeline simply doesn't fly. The post-mortem says one zero-day caused a DoS that let an invalid MWEB tx slip through. The git log on… https://t.co/zMMrheQLPP pic.twitter.com/O3DtdwV0rF The consensus vulnerability that allowed the invalid MWEB peg-out was privately patched between March 19 and March 26, roughly four weeks before the attack. A separate denial-of-service vulnerability was patched on the morning of April 25. Both fixes were rolled into release 0.21.5.4 the same afternoon, after the attack had already begun. "The post-mortem says one zero-day caused a DoS that let an invalid MWEB transaction slip through," bbsz wrote. "The git log tells a slightly different story." A zero-day refers to a vulnerability unknown to defenders at the time of an attack. Litecoin's commit history shows the consensus vulnerability was known and patched privately a month before the exploit, but the fix had not been broadcast publicly or required to all mining pools. That created a window where some miners ran the patched code while others ran the still-vulnerable version, and the attackers appear to have known which was which. Alex Shevchenko, CTO of NEAR Foundation's Aurora project, raised parallel concerns in a thread. Blockchain data showed the attacker pre-funded a wallet 38 hours before the exploit through a Binance withdrawal, with the destination address already configured to swap LTC into ETH on a decentralized exchange. The denial-of-service attack and the MWEB bug were separate components, Shevchenko argued, with the DoS designed to take patched mining nodes offline so the unpatched ones would form the chain that included the invalid transactions. The fact that the network automatically handled the 13-block reorganization once the DoS stopped suggests enough hashrate was running updated code to eventually overpower the attack, but only after the unpatched fork had run for 32 minutes. A hit on Litecoin shows how attacks on various networks differ in how code maintainers and developers react to exploits. Newer chains with smaller, more centralized validator sets coordinate upgrades through chat groups and can push patches network-wide in hours. Older proof-of-work networks like Litecoin and bitcoin rely on independent mining pools choosing when to upgrade, which works for non-urgent changes but creates a window of vulnerability when a security patch needs to reach everyone before an attacker exploits the gap. The Litecoin Foundation has not publicly addressed the GitHub timeline as of Sunday morning. The amount of LTC pegged out during the invalid block window and the value of any swaps completed before the reorganization reversed them have not been disclosed. More For You IBIT options open interest topped Deribit on Friday, signaling rapid institutional adoption of regulated crypto derivatives in the U.S. What to know: - IBIT options open interest topped Deribit on Friday, signaling rapid institutional adoption of regulated crypto derivatives in the U.S. - Positioning differs across markets: IBIT flows appear slightly more bullish than Deribit's BTC options. - Despite similar scale, IBIT and Deribit cater to different investor bases.

資料狀態✓ 已擷取全文閱讀原文（CoinDesk）

🔍歷史類似事件· 關鍵字 + 標的比對4 則

2026-04-26

Litecoin 表示其 13 個區塊的 reorg 並非「zero-day」，但 GitHub commit 歷史記錄顯示事實並非如此

相似度 530%關鍵字 reorg/commit/day

2026-04-25

Litecoin 確認 Zero-Day Bug 導致 13 個區塊的 Reorg，網路已修復並恢復穩定

相似度 280%關鍵字 reorg/day/litecoin

2026-04-26

Litecoin 遭受阻斷服務攻擊，重寫 13 個區塊以消除影響

相似度 130%關鍵字 litecoin/attack

2026-04-19

BTC 跌破 $75,000，Strait of Hormuz 史上首次出現零油輪通行

相似度 130%關鍵字 history/zero

💡 目前用關鍵字 + 標的比對（MVP）· 之後會升級為 embedding 語意搜尋

原始資訊

ID：f3885a9e4b

來源：CoinDesk

發佈：2026-04-26 07:34:37

分類：一般 · 導出分類 neutral

標的：未指定

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 重要 · 💬 0 留言