最新 Politico 民调显示美国选民对 AI 和 Crypto 竞选资金持怀疑态度

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自动抓取6084 字

Deep-pocketed political groups tied to artificial intelligence (AI) and cryptocurrency are rapidly reshaping the midterm money landscape, but many Americans remain uneasy with the industries behind the spending. New Politico Poll Reveals US Voter Skepticism Over AI and Crypto Campaign Cash Key Takeaways: - Fairshake and Leading the Future have deployed over $100 million to influence the 2026 midterm election outcomes. - A Politico poll found 45% of Americans view crypto as too risky, potentially hurting industry-backed candidates. - Lobbyists for OpenAI and Ripple seek a federal framework by 2027 to preempt a patchwork of state-level AI laws. Politico Poll: 45% of Americans Say Cryptocurrency Risks Outweigh Potential Returns New results from the Politico poll find broad public skepticism about crypto and AI, creating a possible conflict for candidates benefiting from an influx of contributions from these two sectors. These groups are pouring millions of dollars into competitive 2026 races to elevate politicians who they believe will support their agendas in Washington. Meanwhile, Americans have been slow to embrace either technology. A 45% plurality of Americans say investing in cryptocurrency is not worth the risk, even if it can yield high returns. Additionally, a 44% plurality says AI is developing too quickly, according to the April survey conducted by the independent firm Public First. These findings highlight a growing disconnect between the capital being deployed by Silicon Valley and the sentiment of the average voter. Nearly half of Americans say they trust a traditional bank with their money more than a cryptocurrency platform, while just 17% say the opposite. Furthermore, two-thirds of respondents support lawmakers either imposing strict regulations or setting broad principles for the AI industry. The results raise an emerging challenge for the industries as their aligned super PACs seek to translate financial might into political influence. Politico’s reporting notes that several of these groups are already becoming the most dominant players on the political battlefield, spending heavily for candidates on both sides of the aisle. In some cases, these tech-focused entities are rivaling the fundraising of long-established party groups. It is too early to say how candidates associated with these groups will fare in November, but the two industries could draw different reactions from voters. In hypothetical head-to-head matchups, Politico poll respondents were much less likely to choose candidates backed by a campaign group seeking looser regulations on artificial intelligence. Instead, voters favored candidates backed by groups advocating for more stringent rules on AI and tech companies. Skepticism of the industries suggests that heavy spending could eventually lead to voter backlash. Leading the Future, a pro-AI super PAC founded in August, has already raised more than $75 million since its launch, according to recent filings with the Federal Election Commission. Through a network of PACs, it has deployed money on primaries in North Carolina, Texas, Illinois, and New York. Fairshake, a pro- crypto group primarily funded by Coinbase, Andreessen Horowitz, and Ripple Labs, has already spent $28 million across several competitive primaries. Both industries are also spending big on Washington lobbyists to ensure their influence continues past Election Day. The AI lobby has ballooned in recent years, with OpenAI and Anthropic spending record amounts of money on lobbyists in the first quarter of 2026. The crypto industry has also poured millions into lobbying efforts to push Congress to enact a sweeping overhaul of digital asset regulation. In the crypto industry, Politico’s study says that the super PAC spending is aimed at pushing through a market-structure bill called the CLARITY Act, which is pending in the Senate. Industry executives hope the proposed law would give the industry a stamp of legitimacy from Washington and deliver long-term certainty about how digital tokens will be overseen by market regulators. The AI groups spending big in elections want to ensure their nascent industry is regulated by one set of federal rules rather than a state-by-state patchwork, according to Politico’s findings. While the tech sector leans toward the GOP’s deregulatory approach, some lobbyists are open to strong federal rules on AI in exchange for a ban on state laws. However, the polling suggests these efforts may run into broader public skepticism regarding job security and safety. More than half of Americans say they have never and would not consider buying or trading cryptocurrency, the Politico poll notes. On artificial intelligence, nearly half of the respondents say it is likely to eliminate more jobs than it creates. Furthermore, a 43% plurality says the risks of the technology outweigh the benefits. The skepticism cuts across partisan lines, with pluralities of voters for both Donald Trump and Kamala Harris in 2024 saying that investing in crypto is not a risk worth taking. A near majority of both groups — 49% of Harris voters and 46% of Trump voters — say AI is developing too quickly. Stablecoins Reach $321B Market Cap as $1B Inflows Lift Sector to New High Stablecoins Reach $321B Market Cap as $1B Inflows Lift Sector to New High Following a week marked by an absence of both inflows and outflows, the stablecoin economy recorded $1.08 billion in inflows… Read NowFollowing a week marked by an absence of both inflows and outflows, the stablecoin economy recorded $1.08 billion in inflows… The Politico poll was conducted by Public First from April 11 to 14, surveying 2,035 U.S. adults online. Results were weighted by age, race, gender, geography, and educational attainment. The overall margin of sampling error is plus or minus 2.2 percentage points. Smaller subgroups have higher margins of error, Politico’s study noted. The Politico editorial regarding the industry poll was co-authored by Erin Doherty, Jasper Goodman, Jessica Piper, Daniel Barnes, and Brendan Bordelon.

数据状态✓ 已抓取全文阅读原文（Bitcoin.com）

🔍历史类似事件· 关键词 + 标的比对6 则

2026-05-03

纽约州强制 Uphold 支付 500 万美元，以解决其涉及欺诈性加密货币投资计划的问题

相似度 180%關鍵字 over/crypto/new

2026-05-07

硬件钱包窃贼因 2.5 亿美元加密货币“劫案”被判入狱 78 个月

相似度 130%關鍵字 crypto/over

2026-05-05

Kraken 与 MoneyGram 达成合作，支持在全球 500,000 个网点进行加密货币套现

相似度 130%關鍵字 cash/crypto

2026-05-03

CoinDesk 的调查显示，在获取金融服务方面，美国人仍然更倾向于银行而非 crypto。

相似度 130%關鍵字 crypto/over

2026-05-03

CoinDesk 民调显示，美国选民不信任 Trump 政府监管 crypto 行业

相似度 130%關鍵字 crypto/poll

2026-05-03

民调显示，随着行业超级政治行动委员会（super PACs）涌入中期选举，美国人对 crypto 和 AI 持不信任态度

相似度 130%關鍵字 crypto/poll

💡 目前用关键词 + 标的比对（MVP）· 之后会升级为 embedding 语义搜寻

原始信息

ID：87981d3c21

来源：Bitcoin.com

发布：2026-05-03 21:22:15

分类：一般 · 导出分类 neutral

标的：未指定

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 重要 · 💬 0 留言