BIS 報告：Crypto Earn 產品類似於存款，但缺乏 FDIC 保障

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自動擷取5130 字

The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a Financial Stability Institute report in April 2026, warning that the largest crypto platforms now operate as financial intermediaries without the capital buffers, deposit insurance or central bank access that apply to traditional banks. BIS Report: Crypto Earn Products Resemble Deposits With No FDIC Protection Key Takeaways: - The BIS Financial Stability Institute warned in April 2026 that major crypto platforms like Binance and Coinbase now operate more like banks than trading venues. - Celsius Network collapsed in 2022 after a USD 1.4 billion depositor run exposed maturity mismatches with no deposit insurance backstop. - Only 11 of 28 jurisdictions reviewed by the FSB in 2025 had a finalized regulatory framework addressing financial stability risks from crypto intermediaries. Crypto Earn Accounts Exposed as Uninsured Deposits, BIS Research Warns The report, authored by Denise Garcia Ocampo of the BIS and Peter Goodrich and Gian-Piero Lovicu of the Financial Stability Board, focused on what researchers call multifunction crypto asset intermediaries, or MCIs. The term covers firms like Binance, Bybit, Coinbase, Crypto.com, Kraken, MEXC and OKX. These platforms have expanded well beyond spot trading and custody. They now offer yield-bearing earn accounts, margin lending, derivatives, and token issuance, functions typically separated across different licensed entities in traditional finance. The total crypto asset market stood at approximately $3 trillion at the end of 2025. Centralized exchanges processed roughly $6 to $8 trillion in spot and futures volume each quarter. Binance alone held about 39% of global centralized spot trading volume. The top five MCIs collectively served an estimated 200 to 230 million users. The paper’s central concern is the earn product. When customers deposit crypto into Binance Simple Earn or Bybit Easy Earn, terms and conditions transfer ownership of those assets to the platform. The MCI pools the funds, deploys them across lending, market-making and DeFi, and pays users a variable yield. Customers become unsecured creditors, not depositors with legal protections. That structure creates short-term redeemable liabilities backed by longer-duration or less liquid assets. Researchers call this maturity and liquidity transformation, the same risk that bank regulators manage through capital and liquidity requirements. MCIs face it without those guardrails. The collapse of Celsius Network in 2022 illustrated the exposure. Celsius experienced net withdrawals of more than $1.4 billion between May and June of that year. By June 12 the platform froze withdrawals. When it filed for bankruptcy on July 12, its balance sheet showed a billion-dollar deficit. The bankruptcy court confirmed Celsius earn users were general unsecured creditors. A flash crash on Oct. 10, 2025, reinforced the concern. Crypto asset prices fell sharply over 30 minutes, triggering cascading automated liquidations across derivatives platforms. Reported direct losses reached $19 billion the following day. Binance suffered an operational outage during the event, and three tokens used as margin collateral, including an algorithmic stablecoin, temporarily lost their pegs. Binance announced $283 million in customer compensation following the incident. The report reviewed terms and conditions from eight major MCIs between November 2025 and March 2026 and found that most earn products grant the platform full discretion over deposited assets, commingle them with other customer funds, and reserve the right to suspend redemptions without notice. Leverage adds further risk. Some platforms allow retail customers up to 150-to-1 margin on derivatives contracts. The paper draws a direct line from that leverage to the October 2025 liquidation cascade. The FSB’s 2025 thematic review found that only 11 of 28 participating jurisdictions, roughly 39%, had a finalized regulatory framework addressing financial stability. Just two of those covered borrowing and lending by MCIs. Three covered earn products. BIS Official Flags $320 Billion Stablecoin Market as Financial Stability Concern BIS Official Flags $320 Billion Stablecoin Market as Financial Stability Concern BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos called global coordination on stablecoin regulation a matter of "critical importance," warning that… Read NowBIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos called global coordination on stablecoin regulation a matter of "critical importance," warning that… The authors call for prudential capital and liquidity requirements, governance standards, stress testing and consolidated supervision applied at the group level. They recommend a combination of entity-based and activity-based regulation, noting that activity-based rules alone cannot address the funding and liquidity risks MCIs carry. Cross-border cooperation remains a core gap. Many large MCIs allocate functions across dozens of jurisdictions through separate legal entities, and formal supervisory information-sharing agreements between regulators remain uncommon.

資料狀態✓ 已擷取全文閱讀原文（Bitcoin.com）

🔍歷史類似事件· 關鍵字 + 標的比對3 則

2026-04-21

據報導，Kalshi 正考慮透過推出永續合約（perpetual futures）來擴展加密貨幣業務

相似度 130%關鍵字 crypto/report

2026-04-21

報告指出：詐騙者向荷姆茲海峽的受困船隻勒索 crypto

相似度 130%關鍵字 crypto/report

2026-04-18

「持續性」的 Crypto Winter？交易量跌至 2023 年以來最低水準——報告

相似度 130%關鍵字 crypto/report

💡 目前用關鍵字 + 標的比對（MVP）· 之後會升級為 embedding 語意搜尋

原始資訊

ID：d5ff7275dc

來源：Bitcoin.com

發佈：2026-04-24 02:30:11

分類：一般 · 導出分類 neutral

標的：未指定

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 重要 · 💬 0 留言