Morgan Stanley: Bitcoin entering bank balance sheets is "very likely," but not right now

📄Full Article· Automatically extracted by trafilaturaGemini 翻譯1571 words

Amy Oldenburg, Head of Wealth Management Solutions at Morgan Stanley, stated at the Bitcoin 2026 conference that it is "not totally out of the question" for banks to hold Bitcoin directly on their balance sheets, but it is "procedurally possible, not imminent." The key obstacle is the 1,250% risk weight assigned to unbacked crypto assets by the Basel Committee, which makes direct holdings almost uneconomic. The Basel Committee announced in February 2026 that it would accelerate the review of prudential standards for crypto assets, with updates expected in the second half of the year. Meanwhile, Morgan Stanley's own Bitcoin ETF has accumulated $163 million in net assets within 13 trading days, as institutional capital is taking positions through the ETF channel. (Context: Bitcoin hits $75,500, Ethereum tests $2,400; Morgan Stanley: Surging oil prices will not shake June and September rate cut forecasts.) (Background: [A Day in Crypto is a Year in the Real World] Morgan Stanley: The speed of Bitcoin's price movement is "15 times that of the Nasdaq.") The remarks made by Amy Oldenburg, Head of Wealth Management Solutions at Morgan Stanley, at the Bitcoin 2026 conference on May 3 were immediately disclosed in an exclusive report by CoinDesk. She provided an intriguing qualification regarding the prospect of banks holding Bitcoin directly on their balance sheets—"not totally out of the question"—but immediately added a crucial caveat: "procedurally possible, not imminent." The market interpretation of these remarks was polarized. Optimists saw it as the first public acknowledgment of "feasibility" by a major Wall Street bank, while the cautious camp focused more on the second half of the sentence—procedural possibility does not equate to practical feasibility. Oldenburg directly identified the most concrete barrier between banks and Bitcoin: the 1,250% risk weight set by the Basel Committee. What does a 1,250% risk weight mean? The current framework of the Basel Committee classifies unbacked crypto assets, such as Bitcoin, into the highest risk category, with a risk weight as high as 1,250%. In plain terms: for every $1 of Bitcoin a bank holds, it must set aside $12.50 in risk capital. In contrast, the risk weight for government bonds is 0%, and high-quality corporate bonds typically fall between 20% and 100%. The practical implication of this figure is that for any large bank regulated under the Basel Accords, holding Bitcoin directly is almost financially unfeasible—the cost of capital consumption far exceeds potential returns, a restriction the industry generally describes as "uneconomic." It is worth noting that the Basel Committee announced in February 2026 that it would accelerate the review of prudential standards for crypto assets, with relevant updates expected to be released in the second half of the year. If the new standards lower the risk weight, it would be a key turning point for the feasibility of balance sheet holdings. Oldenburg also mentioned that there has been significant progress in the regulatory environment over the past 16 months. Multiple regulations pending, ETF channel leads the way In addition to the Basel capital treatment, Oldenburg pointed out a second obstacle: the Federal Reserve's supervisory framework for large banks is not yet in place. For banks to hold Bitcoin on their balance sheets, they need a clear examiner framework from regulators, which is currently lacking. However, she also noted that the Fed revoked its previous guidance on bank crypto-asset activities and dollar-token business in April 2025, signaling a softening of the regulatory stance. While the door to direct balance sheet holdings remains ajar, institutional capital has already entered through another path. The Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust, launched by the firm, accumulated $163 million in net assets in just 13 trading days, indicating strong demand from wealth management clients. Bank of America has also approved its wealth advisors to include 1%-4% Bitcoin allocations in asset allocation recommendations, actively advising clients to gain exposure. BlockTempo observes that bank Bitcoin strategies are taking two distinct paths: one is indirect holding through ETFs and wealth management channels, which is already a reality in the short term; the other is direct balance sheet holding, which remains a medium-to-long-term issue until the Basel framework is relaxed and the Fed's examiner framework is in place. Oldenburg's remark that "it will happen, but the time is not yet right" may be the most accurate market positioning at the moment.

Data Status✓ Full text extractedRead Original (動區 BlockTempo)

🔍Historical Similar Events· Keyword + Asset Matching6 items

2026-05-11

Altseason is here? Two major signals have emerged, but BTC dominance remains at 60%. What will happen next?

Similarity 270%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-05-10

CME plans to launch Bitcoin Volatility futures in June, what is CME's BVX index?

Similarity 270%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-05-10

Trust math, not ideology: Strategy CEO defines the only condition for selling BTC

Similarity 270%標的 BTC同分類 zh

2026-05-10