Clarity Act 的修正案將重塑加密貨幣法案的關鍵部分，但其未來充滿不確定性

📄完整原文· 由 trafilatura 自動擷取6575 字

Clarity Act amendments would remake key parts of crypto bill but have doubtful future The U.S. crypto market structure bill is being targeted with dozens of amendments aiming to change or add to the text as its Senate hearing approaches. What to know: - The crypto market structure bill's hearing in the Senate Banking Committee this week will consider a long list of amendments, virtually all of which won't have a chance of incorporation into the Clarity Act that's expected to advance with the committee's approval. - The proposals — many of them from Democrats who have been critical of the bill — seek to erase or revise significant portions of the legislation that's been negotiated by lawmakers from both parties. - Even a reference to Jeffrey Epstein made the list among dozens of amendments. This week's U.S. Senate Banking Committee hearing to consider edits to the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act has dozens of amendments to weigh, though it's likely that almost all of them won't survive the process of Thursday's event. Lawmakers have pushed forward a range of proposed changes for the market structure bill as it approaches the hearing known as a "markup," from amendments that would establish government-ethics rules to others setting safe harbors for developers to one that would cut out a must-have protection for the decentralized finance (DeFi) sector, plus a number of other smaller, technical adjustments. The list is particularly dominated by a few lawmakers' names, including Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Jack Reed. Their items are expected to be a rhetorical wish list as other members of the committee — mostly Republicans — seek to advance the bill without significant overhauls. Each amendment will be discussed during the hearing and will eventually receive a vote, unless they're withdrawn. A simple majority will be needed to adopt or reject an amendment. Eventually, the Banking Committee will vote to advance the bill itself. Here are some highlights, according to a list of the proposals circulated ahead of the hearing: - Senator Reed, a Rhode Island Democrat, wants to adopt some of the requests from bank lobbyists to further restrict stablecoin yields, according to one of his 18 amendments. - He would also entirely scrap the section known as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act, which shields software developers that don't control people's money from being regulated as money transmitters. - On the same topic, Senator Catherine Cortez-Masto, a Nevada Democrat, wants to "protect software developers by creating a safe harbor from criminal liability for not registering as a money transmitter at the state or federal level." - Senator Chris Van Hollen, a Maryland Democrat, is pushing eight amendments, including one that would institute a major Democratic request: banning the president and other senior government officials from "owning, promoting or affiliating with" digital assets businesses. - Senator Warren would more specifically "prohibit political corruption in banking applications and presidential bank ownership," seeming to directly target the effort from World Liberty Financial — a company tied to President Donald Trump and his family — to obtain a U.S. banking charter. - Warren, who is also seeking to cut out whole swaths of the current bill regarding the oversight of digital commodities, went farther afield with some amendments, trying to cap credit card interest rates and calling for bank supervisory records involving "Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators." (The bill itself does include some non-crypto provisions, including legislation targeted at housing championed by Senator John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican.) - Senator Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat who has been at the center of illicit-finance negotiations involving DeFi, is proposing "a control test to determine when persons operating non-decentralized finance trading protocols are subject to" Bank Secrecy Act anti-money laundering obligations. - On the Republican side of the committee, Senator Bill Hagerty from Tennessee is seeking a ban of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) issued by the U.S. Federal Reserve. CBDC bans have already been pushed in various other bills by lawmakers, most recently in the House of Representatives' bill to reauthorize the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Thursday's session to consider advancing the Clarity Act is likely already well planned for what the Republican majority will allow into the legislation. The last time the Clarity Act was on final approach to a markup in this same committee, it made it to this stage in which some 75 amendments were offered, though that hearing was postponed shortly after. Previous wrinkles in the negotiation have since been ironed out over four months of talks, clearing a path for committee approval this week. Once that happens, this bill can be merged with the parallel effort that already cleared the Senate Agriculture Committee. However, some significant changes are still expected after this week, including the effort to resolve the Democrats' demand for a conflict-of-interest provision on cutting ties between government officials and the crypto sector, most notably seen with the president and his family. A meeting earlier this week on that ethics provision reportedly remained contentious, and Democrats including Senator Kirsten Gillibrand have said the Clarity Act will not get approved in the Senate without it. Clarity's advocates need to secure a number of Democratic supporters for the bill if it's going to clear the 60-vote hurdle that's standard in the Senate. Then the bill needs to get another approval from the U.S. House, which had already passed a similar bill last year. In a Wednesday posting on social media site X, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong called the bill "strong" and said it "will benefit the American people by making the US financial system faster, cheaper and more accessible." "Mark it up," he said. Read More: Clarity Act, in the flesh, unveiled by U.S. Senate Banking Committee before hearing More For You If found guilty of violating the Parliamentary code of conduct, the Reform UK party leader could be suspended from the House of Commons. What to know: - Nigel Farage is facing a formal investigation by the parliamentary standards watchdog over his failure to declare a 5 million-pound gift from crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne, U.K. news services reported. - Farage and his Reform UK party argue the donation, said to cover his security costs, was a purely personal gift...

資料狀態✓ 已擷取全文閱讀原文（CoinDesk）

🔍歷史類似事件· 關鍵字 + 標的比對6 則

2026-05-13

Schumer 表示民主黨希望推動一項優質的加密貨幣法案，CLARITY Act 正進入關鍵階段

相似度 280%關鍵字 key/act/clarity

2026-05-12

工會與銀行業聯手反對參議院加密貨幣法案 The Clarity Act

相似度 230%關鍵字 act/clarity/bill

2026-05-11

Clarity Act 表決定於週四：以下是該加密貨幣法案的當前進度

相似度 230%關鍵字 act/clarity/crypto

2026-05-02

CLARITY Act 穩定幣收益規則定案：加密貨幣法案進入「執行階段」

相似度 230%關鍵字 act/clarity/crypto

2026-05-02

CLARITY Act 穩定幣收益規則定案：加密貨幣法案「正式啟動」

相似度 230%關鍵字 act/clarity/crypto

2026-04-22

CEO 稱 CLARITY Act 為「可怕的法案」，並警告加密貨幣市場恐將面臨長期熊市

相似度 200%關鍵字 act/clarity/crypto

💡 目前用關鍵字 + 標的比對（MVP）· 之後會升級為 embedding 語意搜尋

原始資訊

ID：12fffd49ec

來源：CoinDesk

發佈：2026-05-13 14:01:25

分類：一般 · 導出分類 neutral

標的：未指定

社群投票：+0 / −0 · ⭐ 0 重要 · 💬 0 留言